Back
SEARCH AND PRESS ENTER
Recent Posts

First, Do No Harm: Navigating Bioethics in Medicine

In this Dear Mentor feature, we hear from Kendrick Yu, a second-year medical student at the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s Heersink School of Medicine, who is grappling with one of the most fundamental concepts in medicine: the Hippocratic oath’s call to “First, Do No Harm.”  His thoughtful questions open the door to a candid and compassionate response from a mentor with years of experience navigating the intersection of clinical care and bioethics.

Dear Mentor,  

My name is Kendrick Yu, and I am currently a second-year medical student at the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s Heersink School of Medicine. Before receiving our white coat and beginning our journeys as medical students, we are required to recite the Hippocratic oath and etch the phrase, “First, Do No Harm,” into our hearts and minds. But what does this truly mean in practice? How does a deeper understanding of bioethics impact the way physicians approach patient care? Was there a moment in your career that challenged your understanding of this principle? How can students prepare for the transition into a medical environment where ethical decisions rarely have a clear or ‘correct’ answer?

Thank you for your time and guidance!

KendrickYu_Bio_Featured

Kendrick Yu
MD Candidate, Class of 2027
University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine

Response From the Mentor

Dear Kendrick,

First, let me congratulate you on making it through the first year of medical school! That is certainly a rite of passage and includes many “firsts,” like the white coat ceremony. The oath that we take in those early days is made with anticipation and sometimes only partial understanding of the challenges we will face. We will find ourselves in ambiguous or contradictory clinical situations as we progress into the wards and units and clinics of the hospital. No one embarks on that journey with the intent to do harm. Yet, everyone does do harm. Harms are inevitable in a practice that offers treatments that are effective because they are powerful.

As you make it through the second year and enter the clinical years, you are also shifting from a world of multiple-choice questions to a ward full of human conditions that do not have clear cut “right answers.” This is a great time to think about what knowledge and skills can help you think clearly and fairly about often unclear and unfair situations.

Bioethics is a field that developed in the middle part of the twentieth century to help guide medical decision making and protect vulnerable populations. Ethics in general looks at what is right and wrong. Bioethics in particular, looks at what is right and wrong in the context of living beings and their health and ability to flourish. It is important to know that it arose in the aftermath of the Nuremberg Doctor’s trials of 1947 which exposed the horrific abuses of human subjects in medical experiments in World War II and it continued to gain relevance during the 1960s and 70s when trust in authorities of all kinds, including medical, was being questioned. In many ways, the original purpose of bioethics was not to do good, but to protect people from both harm and coercion.

That phrase “First, do no harm” is one of the most resonant and meaningful in the medical profession so let’s look at it a little closer. Almost always we focus on the “harm” part of the statement and the “first” is just a throwaway. But think about that “first” a little bit more. Medical interventional almost always poses the risk of some harm. But if harm is inevitable,itshouldnevercomefirst. Firstcomesthedoctor- patient relationship and the trust that guides everything else. First comes the intention to help and to provide benefit.

The bioethical Doctrine of Double Effect addresses the issue that arises when you need to do something to get a good outcome, but that very action will also cause a bad effect. Attributed to St. Thomas Acquinas, this doctrine says that the good effect is what is intended, not the bad effect; the bad effect is foreseen but not desired; and there must be a proportionate threat or risk that justifies the badness of the bad outcome.

One moment in my career that really made me think about this was when I was taking care of a patient with dementia who had a large cancer invading his eye. As a head and neck surgical oncologist, I knew that this could potentially be cured and would definitely relieve some of his suffering if we operated to remove his eye. As a clinical ethicist, I knew that even with a surrogate decision maker’s consent for this patient lacking capacity, an orbital exenteration was extreme and would be considered mutilating by many. I did my best to see things from the patient’s perspective and to show kindness and establish trust. He implored me to remove the cancer and ease his pain, but refused the general anesthesia that was necessary. We balanced his understanding and capacity against the values and goals he was able to express and, with the support of a court appointed guardian and our full care team, we proceeded to sedate him and complete the operation. Here again, you see the importance of the order of events. First, is kindness and empathy. Harm is always relative and harm should never come first.

My journey to the work that I love as a clinical bioethicist began with the medical humanities. Before I even thought about going to medical school, I was a musician and a historian and when I discovered the field of medical humanities I dove into the intersections of medicine and history, philosophy and literature. One of my favorite topics was empathy-how we are able to see things from someone else’s perspective. Beyond learning about bioethics and its techniques, I would encourage you to read widely-novels, poetry, short stories, as well as social sciences like history and anthropology and psychology. Reading immerses you in the stories of other people but it also trains your mind to think about situations that do not have clear-cut right answers and to balance competing values and compare benefits and burdens.

Best regards,

Susan D. McCammon, MFA, MD, FACS, FAAHPM, PhD

Headshot of Dr. Susan McCammon, MD (Professor, Otolaryngology) in white medical coat, November 2021.

Susan D. McCammon, MFA, MD, FACS, FAAHPM, PhD

Susan D. McCammon, MFA, MD, FACS, FAAHPM, PhD is the John W. Poynor Professor of Otolaryngology and Director of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology at the UAB Heersink School of Medicine in Birmingham, Alabama. There she serves as the Director of the Pat and Jean Sullivan Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Program, one of the only survivorship programs in the US that enroll patients at the time of diagnosis. Dr. McCammon’s career includes a focus on medical ethics. As Associate Medical Director of the UAB Clinical Ethics program, she provides clinical ethics consultation for high-risk surgical patients. Prior to that, she was the Past Chair of the Ethics Committee of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Currently, McCammon serves as Adjunct Faculty in the Department of Bioethics at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Her research interests include medical decision-making, narrative ethics, prognostication, and goal-concordant care for patients with advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer.

Leave Your Comment